Michelle Malkin Versus Michelle Obama. FLOTUS Wins Hands Down

By Jueseppi B.





A very ugly woman huh? Inside and out. This is Ms. Michelle Malkin. Until today I didn’t know she existed. After reading her garbage on First Lady Michelle Obama she still does not exist.









Yes, Michelle Obama is fair game

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 30, 2012 09:22 AM

Who will vet the First Lady? It’s Michelle vs. Michelle, Round 2.



The first lady of the United States is on a whirlwind publicity tour for her hefty new food and gardening book($30), which the White House hopes will bolster Team Obama’s favorability ratings. I’d say it’s a classic recipe for rank campaign hypocrisy and media double standards.


While journalists savor chummy chitchats with Mrs. Obama about beets and Beyonce, FLOTUS is once again escaping hard questions about her cronyismjunk science and generous junkets at taxpayer expense.


Mrs. Obama’s 2012 campaign media blitz has already brought her to daytime airwaves (“The Ellen DeGeneres Show”), prime-time reality TV (“The Biggest Loser”) and children’s programming (“iCarly”). This week, she’s hitting up “Good Morning America,” “The View,” Rachael Ray’s cooking show, “LIVE! with Kelly (Ripa)” and Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.”


Out: Let’s Move! In: Let’s Move … in front of the TV cameras!


My prediction? As soon as the fawning media frenzy dies down and Mrs. Obama’s book rises to the top of The New York Times best-seller list, POTUS will go back to claiming that FLOTUS is a “private citizen” who should be left alone. The Obamas’ Chicago strategists have long enjoyed invoking selective immunity for the first lady without challenge. Lapdog reporters have assisted in creating an impenetrable bubble of political protection around the profligate, policy-meddling first lady.


We’ve seen it before.


When conservatives challenged Mrs. O’s caustic 2008 campaign trail statements disparaging America and fear-mongering for votes, her hubby invoked the “civilian” shield. He threatened Republicans to “lay off his wife,” arguing that political spouses should not be subject to public scrutiny because they didn’t choose public life.


When Mrs. O’s lavish vacation in Spain — accompanied by an entourage of 70 Secret Service agents and 250 Spanish law enforcement officers — provoked a massive public backlash in 2010, then-White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs argued that the first lady was a “private citizen” who should be off-limits to tough questions about her behavior.




Obama’s outspoken bitter half conscientiously and deliberately inserted herself into the public square long before the family moved to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue — whether it was organizing a Woods Fund panel with her husband and Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers, taking a publicly subsidized government job withChicago Mayor Richard Daley, or parlaying her relationship with political mentor Valerie Jarrett into acushy public job at the University of Chicago Medical Center, where she oversaw a patient-dumping scheme that benefited her political cronies.


As I reported earlier this month, Mrs. Obama’s signature program (now run by Obama’s best golfing buddy Dr. Eric Whitaker) just received a $6 million grant from an Obamacare agency with zero independent oversight. Taste the boodle.


Just a humble private mom raising her two daughters while Dad does all that hardball politics stuff? Pshaw. Let’s not forget that Mrs. Obama leveraged her hubby’s Senate victory to snag a lucrative seat on the corporate board of directors of TreeHouse Foods, Inc. despite having zero experience in the industry.


When her garden gloves are off, her political boxing gloves are on. Mrs. O famously has castigated other Americans’ choices in how they earn their money. She used her East Wing power to push Obamacare. She has exploited the bully pulpit to restrict food advertisers’ speech. She has served the SEIU’s legislative agenda of increasing the welfare state and padding membership rolls with more government school workers under the guise of fighting child obesity.


And she has relied on questionable science to declare war on so-called “food deserts” in poor neighborhoods where she claims only fast food is available. But according to two major peer-reviewed and published studies: 1) poor neighborhoods had nearly twice the number of supermarkets and large-scale grocers per square mile as wealthier neighborhoods, and 2) there is no correlation between what students in a large-scale California survey ate, what they weighed and what kinds of food they ate within the immediate radius of their homes.


While she denies a Nanny State agenda, Mrs. Obama successfully has strong-armed several major restaurant chains into redesigning their menus to her exacting healthful standards. One of those targets is Darden Restaurants, which operates Olive Garden and Red Lobster restaurants across the country. At a time when most food service providers are struggling under the weight of increased taxes, health care mandates and regulations, Darden Restaurants just happens to be one of the few and fortunate businesses to obtain one of those coveted Obamacare waivers.


When Michelle Obama stops using her public office to push new Big Government power grabs and redistribute wealth to her cronies (flashback: Chicago Obama-lympics), stoke racial grievances, and meddle in Obama administration personnel decisions that lead to whistleblower firings (ask her about former AmeriCorps Inspector General Gerald Walpin), I’ll leave her alone.


Until then, someone’s got to deliver FLOTUS her just desserts.


End of garbage article.



Most of the coverage of conservative talk this week has been about embarrassing affiliates of the American rights– or rather, of one in particular, Donald Trump. Trump is a successful businessman and comical reality TV character who has kooky and generally dismissed views about the President’s birth certificate.


But say what you will about Trump (and boy is it fun to say anything about Trump) he at least has the good sense of talking about legitimate issues like our relationship with China and energy dependence and scolding those who bring up the birther topic for baiting him with distractions about our President. And even when he voluntarily brings up the long-dead birther argument, he never drags the First Lady, Sasha, or Malia into it. He just doesn’t waste his time attacking anyone but President Obama.


Malkin, on the other hand, seems to have made a tactical decision that attacking President Obama, a public official running for reelection, and his policies will have a less positive impact on the public discourse than calling the First Lady “anti-American” and making ad hominem attacks on her– the same kind of attack that Rosen made and was rightfully lambasted for. To quote Malkin herself, “there’s so much hypocrisy, that we could drown in it.


Ms. Michelle Malkin is a true dumbass looking for attention and media coverage. I originally thought Donald Chump was the Biggest Loser this week, now that title goes to Ms. Michelle Malkin.


She can’t even write very well.






Now hear me and hear me clearly….is this bitch crazy? Taking on FLOTUS Obama for her campaign on obesity is like taking on Mother Teresa for fighting to heal the sick and feed starving children while she stops all wars.


Michelle Obama has accomplished things Michelle Malkin has not even thought of yet. Education wise the FLOTUS leaves this 3rd rate hack in the dust. Lets not forget Michelle Obama is The First lady Of The United States. Michelle Malkin writes a blog.


End of story.





10 replies »

  1. I never heard of this woman until I read this article. Why should we care what she thinks !!! Our FLOTUS has more class in her little toe , than this woman will ever have and she’s just jealous !!!


    • I never heard about this woman until I wrote this post, and we should care only to be informed about what people are talking about. We can only fight lies & misinformation with truth & facts if we know whom to fight. Remember Knowledge 2 Truth 2 Education 2 Power.


  2. You hadn’t heard of her? I could have told you about her, and other crazy, hackish crap she’s said over the years. Seriously, there are so many pictures of this woman making the ugliest of faces during her mind-numbing rants. Geraldo Rivera even went as far as to say he’d spit in her face if he ever met her.


Reply At Your Own Risk. Leave The Dumbfuckery At The Door.

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s